Although banks are not responsible for events outside their establishment, not reacting when identifying unusual operations causes objective civil liability, generating compensation for moral damages. reproduction Elderly woman was the victim of a sudden kidnapping and was forced to make a series of withdrawals With this understanding, the 2nd Appeal Panel of the Special Courts of Acre ordered a banking institution to compensate an elderly consumer victim of a flash kidnapping. According to the records, the criminals forced the client to make a series of withdrawals from different agencies, in addition to loans.
The bank manager identified unusual operations but Iran Telegram Number Data only blocked the card after the withdrawals had been made. Judge Robson Aleixo, rapporteur of the Appeal, rejected the allegations that the bank was not responsible, I understand that although the institution is not responsible for the kidnapping, “the carrying out of withdrawals inside the bank branch and the knowledge of an agent (employee ) of the bank for unusual operations, characterizes the internalization of the crime to the legal sphere of the bank (…) giving rise to objective civil liability (which does not depend on fault)”.
In this situation, it is important to keep in mind that civil liability regulated in consumer legislation is objective, that is, the manufacturer responds regardless of the existence of fault, being fully responsible for the products it puts into circulation on the market for consumers.” According to him, the company must provide full assistance and repair the damage suffered by those who drank the contaminated drink. "Regarding suspicions of sabotage committed by a former employee, the producer remains jointly and severally responsible for the acts of his representatives, except for his right of recourse against the person who caused the damage.
_________________
Iran Telegram Number Data